Perhaps, we even expected this. We will certainly continue the fight against the Russian law, - this is how the head of ISFED, Nino Dolidze, responds on the social network to the fact that the Constitutional Court did not meet the request to suspend the law "On transparency of foreign influence", although it recognized the lawsuits as admissible for review.

According to him, it is a pity that the court did not use the opportunity to make a significant contribution to the country's democratic and European development process.

"The Constitutional Court did not suspend the operation of the norms of the Russian law.

It is a pity that the court did not use the opportunity, with its decision, to make a significant contribution to the country's democratic and European development process. Perhaps, we even expected this.

We will definitely continue our fight against the Russian law", writes Nino Dolidze.

For information, the Constitutional Court of Georgia did not meet the request to suspend the law "On transparency of foreign influence". In addition, the court recognized the submitted lawsuits as partially admissible, which means that their substantive discussions will begin. "The petition of the claimant party, pending the final decision on the case, to suspend the validity of the disputed norms" - it is written in the decision of the Constitutional Court.