In the elections of October 26, the secrecy of the vote was not violated - the secrecy of the vote from a legal point of view means that when the voter is in the booth and colors the candidate of theirs choice, no one should be watching them at that moment and no one should be able to see what decision they are making, - this was explained by the Vice-Speaker of the Parliament Giorgi Kakhiani to the media.

According to Kakhiani, judge Vladimer Khuchua, first of all, should have determined at least one fact, that when the voter was in the booth and voted for any party, whether someone was observing his decision or not.

According to Kakhiani, the judge does not judge such facts at all.

"Of course, the secrecy of the vote is the most important principle of the election process.

More than 2 million people took part in the elections, and I do not recall a single case of anyone protesting that their vote was not kept confidential. Not a single complaint was filed in this regard on the election day. After the opposition became convinced that they had lost the election, during the recounting of the ballots, they discovered that a felt-tip pen appeared to have leaked onto the other side of the ballot. It was after that that they started talking about the violation of the secrecy of the voice. All this indicates that the secrecy of the vote was not violated in the elections.

From a legal point of view, the secrecy of the vote means that when the voter is in the booth and colors the candidate of theirs choice, at that moment no one should be watching them and no one should be able to see what decision they are making. I have not heard of any such case. There was only one such case, and as it turned out, the representative of the "National Movement" was observing the voter there as well.

In general, there are no elections where a defect cannot occur, but the defects did not affect the results of the election.

Let's see how the appellate court presents evidence regarding the secrecy of the vote.

A family member of this judge is an active oppositionist. It is questionable and needs to be investigated if it has been proven that Aleko Elisashvili knew in advance what decision the judge would make. It is a serious violation if someone knew in advance what decision the judge would make," said Giorgi Kakhiani.

The Tetritskaro court confirmed the violation of vote secrecy. Judge Vladimer Khuchua satisfied GYLA's claim and annulled the results of the electronic district in Tsalka and Tetritskaro districts.

As Khuchua explained, the court unequivocally and unequivocally believes that the voter did not have the right to vote. According to him, once and for all, it should be possible to manage the election environment and administration in such a way that any manipulation and illegal interference is excluded and not dependent on someone's good will.

.