This is another evidence when, even though it is formal, the president makes a statement that directly serves the step taken against the restoration of territorial integrity - she goes against the principle of non-recognition and practically recognizes the independence of Abkhazia with his statement - this is how the member of the parliamentary majority Guram Macharashvili responded to the President of Georgia Salome Zurabishvili. The post spread on the social network about the decision of the so-called court of occupied Abkhazia which did not support the repeal of the law prohibiting the transfer of Bichvinta country houses to third parties, with the caption: "An example of independence from Abkhaz judges".

According to Macharashvili, Salome Zurabishvili is already openly and clearly carrying out the orders of foreign forces.

"Unfortunately, we are no longer surprised by Zurabishvili's statements, which harm the state of Georgia. This is another evidence when even a formal, but still president, makes a statement that directly serves as a step against the restoration of territorial integrity. We want to restore the territorial integrity in a peaceful way, and at the same time, it goes against the principle of non-recognition and practically, with its statement, recognizes the independence of Abkhazia. This is a sad fact, but we are not surprised, because Zurabishvili is already openly and clearly fulfilling the orders of foreign forces.

It doesn't matter if it is said about a judge or about any public official, when you formally, but still the president, recognize any public official of an independent entity recognized by Russia, Abkhazia, and his legitimacy, it means that you practically recognize the independence of Abkhazia, and I repeat again, this is a mistake I don't think, unfortunately, she fulfills the orders of foreign forces", said Guram Macharashvili.

For information, the President of Georgia Salome Zurabishvili responded on the social network to the information regarding the decision of the so-called court of occupied Abkhazia which did not support the repeal of the law prohibiting the transfer of Bichvinta cottages to third parties. The President evaluated the mentioned move as "an example of independence from Abkhazian judges."