Mrs. Salome! Your post contains not only incorrect words and spelling errors, but you are wrong from beginning to end, - Georgian Dream MP Nino Tsilosani writes about this on social media, thereby responding to Salome Zurabishvili’s “post” about the statement of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

In addition, Tsilosani also addresses those individuals who intend to disrupt the work of the Georgian Parliament tomorrow and create anarchy, stating that seizing or blocking an object of strategic or special importance is a criminal offense.

“Mrs. Salome! Your post contains not only incorrect words and spelling errors, but you are wrong from beginning to end.

And for those who intend to disrupt the work of the Georgian Parliament tomorrow and create anarchy, there is a law and internationally accepted norms for the protection of democracy - seizing or blocking an object of strategic or special importance is a crime and is punishable by criminal articles, imprisonment... Article 222”, - writes Nino Tsilosani on Facebook.

For information, the Ministry of Internal Affairs responds to the protest action planned before the convocation of the 11th Parliament and warns the organizers not to exceed the limits established by the Law on Assembly/Manifestation and to refrain from unlawful actions. As the agency explains, otherwise, the police will take all appropriate legal measures to prevent illegal actions. In addition, the Ministery of Internal Affairs statement indicates that the law directly prohibits the blocking of a strategic or special importance facility, which is a punishable act under Article 222 of the Criminal Code of Georgia.

The President of Georgia assessed the statement of the Ministry of Internal Affairs on social networks and described it as a threat.

“If they had said, ‘I will arrest you all’… this is yet another violation of the main principle of the Constitution – the right to demonstrate and assemble! What is the point of restricting this right by law or decree! Threats are also useless… this is yet another proof of Russian-style governance.”