Everyone should know one truth: in reality, there is no negotiation process on joining the European Union - this is a process of fulfilling the tasks of Brussels, which at some point even Brussels itself admits - calling this process negotiations is an absolute farce! – said the Chairman of the Parliament, Shalva Papuashvili.

As Papuashvili noted in this context, “the process of negotiations for accession to the European Union is called ‘negotiation’ only in name and is in reality a process of implementing directives set by Brussels,” and he discovered while studying EU law.

Papuashvili also said that “it is understandable that when you want to become a member of an organization, you have to comply with criteria and regulations, but it is not understandable when, beyond that, invented criteria, tasks and directives are given, behind which is the desire to establish control over a sovereign country.”

Papuashvili cited the vetting of judges as an example of this and emphasized that the vetting procedure has not been carried out in any EU country.

Speaking to reporters, he also stated that the requirement to elect the Prosecutor General by a qualified majority meant “to gain control over the agency with the participation of a marginal minority under their influence.”

“The process of negotiating membership in the European Union is actually a unilateral assignment of tasks and the execution of these tasks at the discretion of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. They do not even leave you the freedom to have different options - more or less, the fulfillment of some obligations may be postponed.

On the one hand, this is understandable in that if you want to become a member of the organization and if there are some directives, norms that you need to implement in your legislation, of course, you have to implement them. Half of the EU legislation has already been implemented in Georgia under the Association Agreement, but the problem is that there is a new trend from Brussels - some additional requirements are being thought up that are not defined by directives or strict documents.

For example, the vetting of judges, which is the fruit of the imagination of unelected European bureaucrats. Not a single EU document, directive, provides for such a thing. None of their countries have such a thing. They do not conduct it, but they ask other countries for a simple reason - this is a procedure by which they try to gain leverage over the justice system of another country. In Moldova, this process is being conducted by Zurab Adeishvili's former deputy - Nona Tsotsoria, during whose time the torture system was created in Georgia. This person is the main member of the jury in the selection of judges. In Ukraine, they have Zurab Adeishvili as a person appointed from the outside. He is the shadow prosecutor general of Ukraine. People performing external tasks must ensure that external forces and groups gain control over the courts in Moldova and Ukraine, so that they can then rule the country from the justice system.

So, recently, criteria have been invented by Brussels, such as vetting. Do you remember, in the nine recommendations they wrote that NGOs funded from abroad should be involved in decision-making at all levels of government. It actually means that you should give the right to veto and interfere in your politics to the Transparency International registered in Estonia. Why don't they themselves involve them in all the decisions they make?!

Wherever the European Union accused our justice system of various injustices, the European Union was defeated everywhere - all the ambassadors and NGOs who accused our justice system of injustice were defeated. The European Union was defeated in all cases with the Georgian justice system," said Shalva Papuashvili.