How are Tsulukiani and Khazaradze different in relation to the law? - If you are making this decision, it means that you are under influence, you are afraid to bring leading figures of the ruling party here, because you will be reprimanded for this, - Mamuka Khazaradze, the leader of Lelo-Strong Georgia, stated at the court hearing.
According to him, the court has been deliberating for 6 hours, why there is a problem with summoning the commission members as witnesses.
"We have been discussing for 6 hours why it is a problem to summon the other side, just as I have been summoned. What privilege do those people have in relation to the law that you cannot summon Tsulukiani, Subari and others? What privilege do they have? I am also an elected MP, Levan Samushia too, but we left the parliament because Georgian Dream stole votes. If you summon me and want to indict me, what advantage do Tsulukiani, Subari and others enjoy. If it is a unilateral game, tell us, there is no problem. If you are making this decision, it means that you are under influence, you are afraid to bring leading figures of the ruling party here, because you will receive a reprimand for this, or something else. How are Tsulukiani and Khazaradze different in relation to the law?”- he said Mamuka Khazaradze.
Earlier, the defense filed a motion to have Tea Tsulukiani, the chairwoman of the investigative commission, and other members of the commission questioned in court, which was not satisfied by Judge Levan Gelovani, which was then followed by the defense filing a motion to recuse the judge, which was also not satisfied.
v-if="article.gallery" v-html="article.gallery"
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
